1. Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars inferior Federal Courts from voiding State Court judgments that are void ab initio under State and Federal law?

2. A) Does Rooker-Feldman overrule the Fourteenth Amendment duty of the Federal Courts to review claims for facial relief; ie. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
B) Like the rulings in this case, do the inferior Federal Courts suddenly lose jurisdiction to preserve, protect, and defend core constitutional freedoms if a citizen challenges State Court judgments that are void ab initio under Texas and Federal law?

3. In a case of first impression, whether the Texas Vexatious Litigant Statutes are pre-empted by 42 U.S.C. §1981, and facially unconstitutional as an unlawful prior restraint abridging the core First Amendment privileges or immunities of speech, expression, and to petition?

4. Does the Texas Courts' enforcement of facially unconstitutional statutes constitute a due process violation of the most basic sort actionable under 42 U.S.C.§$1983?

Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars inferior Federal Courts from voiding State Court judgments that are void ab initio under State and Federal law?