No. 22-5892
Shamar Cortez Womack v. United States
Tags: categorical-approach federal-counterpart generic-offense gonzales-v-duenas-alvarez nongeneric-conviction overbroad-statute prior-conviction state-prosecution statutory-elements
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a state statute is facially broader than its federal counterpart, must a defendant still offer examples of overbroad state prosecutions to confirm the statute's scope?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a state statute is facially broader than its federal counterpart, must a defendant still offer examples of overbroad state prosecutions to confirm the statute's scope?
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2022)
2022-09-14
Application (22A133) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until October 20, 2022.
2022-09-09
Application (22A133) to extend further the time from September 21, 2022 to October 20, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
2022-08-16
Application (22A133) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 21, 2022.
2022-08-10
Application (22A133) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 21, 2022 to September 21, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Shamar Cortez Womack
Jeffrey T. Green — Sidley Austin, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent