No. 22-5885

Christopher Surles v. Warden, Limestone Correctional Facility, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeals appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure due-process federal-government federal-procedure notice-of-appeal procedural-rules standing time-limitation time-limits united-states-agency
Latest Conference: 2023-03-31 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does the Order of Dismissal (Appendix Z) does that make the United States a party to the appeal?

What is the time limit for the filing of a notice of Appeal when the United States or an agency of the United States is a party?

Is the time between April 2022 then 3/84/2022 approximately 15 days (protest)?

Was the Notice of Appeal (Appendix C), Filed in a timely manner?

Does the U.S. Appeals Court-For the 11th circuit court have jurisdiction for the action in the nature of Appeal (Appendix E) and Supplement Appendix G?

Is there an equitable tolling exception for the filing of a Notice of Appeal?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the time limit for filing a notice of appeal is extended when the United States or an agency of the United States is a party?

Docket Entries

2023-04-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-03-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-02-01
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent Warden, Limestone Correctional Facility, et al. to respond filed.
2022-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 21, 2022)

Attorneys

Christopher Surles
Christopher Surles — Petitioner
Warden, Limestone Correctional Facility, et al.
David Hunter HammOffice of the Alabama Attorney General, Respondent