No. 22-5869
Carlos Ivan Chavira-Montanez v. United States
Tags: alleyne almendarez-torres apprendi constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review precedent-analysis sentencing statutory-construction supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183)
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Carlos Ivan Chavira-Montanez
Judy Fulmer Madewell — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent