No. 22-5865
Charles Smith v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-procedure criminal-conviction criminal-procedure jurisdiction jurisdictional-defect ninth-circuit plea-agreement sentencing waiver
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in dismissing the appeal when Mr. Smith's plea agreement contains a count of conviction and resulting sentence that is no longer a crime, and an illegal sentence is a jurisdictional defect that is not waivable?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in dismissing the appeal
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Charles Smith
Marisa Conroy — Law Office of Marisa L. D. Conroy, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent