Is it true, that the courts errored by allowing the USBK Court Division Portland, Oregon
and their attorney's to violate Webster's "Due Process Rights" allowing Respondents "false
claims" to stand in a federal bankruptcy court proceeding, as "Secured and Unsecured
Creditors" without perfected claims assisting pretend creditors to "FORECLOUSURE" on the farm
but instead assisting in the cover-up by attempting to dismiss Webster's bankruptcy, while under
the protections of 18 USC 152(4), knowingly and fraudulently presents any false claim for proof
against the estate of a debtor ?

2. Is it true, the courts errored by dismissing Webster's lawfully filed bankruptcy case
without discharge, and without dispute of Webster's affidavit and Motion for Summary
Judgement, also requiring full-discharge by force majeure on April 15, 2020 due to COVID 19
and it's devastating effects to the economies, the supply chains, now causing major disruptions
with the effects of sever hyper-inflation all around the world, preventing normal commerce?

Is it true that the courts erred by allowing the USBK Court Division Portland, Oregon and their attorneys to violate webster's due-process-rights allowing respondents' false-claims to stand in a federal bankruptcy-court proceeding as secured-and-unsecured-creditors without perfected-claims assisting pretend-creditors to foreclosure on the farm but instead assisting in the cover-up by attempting to dismiss webster's bankruptcy, while under the protections of 18-usc-152-4 knowingly and fraudulently presents any false-claim for proof against the estate of a debtor?