No. 22-586
Kimberly Beemer, et al. v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-challenge covid-19-restrictions due-process emergency-powers free-speech fundamental-rights judicial-review mootness standing voluntary-cessation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is this constitutional challenge to the Michigan Governor's emergency restrictions that directly infringed fundamental rights moot when the restrictions are capable of repetition yet so short in duration that they evade review and the Governor voluntarily ceased the allegedly unlawful action while this lawsuit was pending?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is this constitutional challenge to the Michigan Governor's emergency restrictions that directly infringed fundamental rights moot when the restrictions are capable of repetition yet so short in duration that they evade review and the Governor voluntary ceased the allegedly unlawful action while this lawsuit was pending?
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-25
Waiver of right of respondents Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel to respond filed.
2022-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Kimberly Beemer, et al.
Robert Joseph Muise — American Freedom Law Center, Petitioner
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent