No. 22-5851
Siaosi Vanisi v. William Reubart, Acting Warden
IFP
Tags: competency criminal-procedure double-jeopardy gross-negligence intent-requirement mental-competency oregon-v-kennedy self-representation
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does gross negligence on the part of the State satisfy the intent
requirement as set forth in Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667 (1982) so that
double jeopardy attaches following defendant's motion for mistrial?
2. Can a defendant who has been found to be competent to stand trial
and presents only marginal mental health concerns be denied the right to
self-representation as described by this Court in Faretta v. California, 422
U.S. 806 (1975)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does gross negligence satisfy the intent requirement for double jeopardy?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-16
Brief of respondents William Reubart, Acting Warden in opposition filed.
2022-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2022)
2022-08-09
Application (22A114) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 15, 2022.
2022-08-05
Application (22A114) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 16, 2022 to October 15, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Siaosi Vanisi
William Reubart, et al.
Jennifer Patricia Noble — Washoe County District Attorney, Respondent