No. 22-5845
Skiboky Stora v. New York State Board of Elections
IFP
Tags: attorney-communication civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment free-speech judicial-communication judicial-conduct standing
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Communication s between Respondents Attorneys
oilnd TIE OCtef Siveeney ON the. Todge Persona) Lei) Pbene
the ty Pafde. comm UNitawch cb Pade 2 ef the Ta nsctie- For.
the feu Wear. in en Tufy PAG AERA HEH he Off tre tansércith
Di duet Communication between the Tubde and The £es Pon Jent
Vislatta the Setitene? Sikibewy SteRA fifi, amin Amen
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the communications between Respondents' Attorneys and the Chief Sweeny on the Judge's Personal Cell Phone violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Skiboky Stora
Skiboky Stora — Petitioner