No. 22-5841

Harry Sharod James v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure commerce-clause confrontation-clause constitutional-authority district-court filing-fee judicial-tax procedural-discretion standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2022-11-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OFNORTH CAROLINA " EASTERN DISTRICT"
abuse its discretion by not establishing subject Matter Juris diction,
once it was challenged
by petitioner via motion?

r.
Clause" of the Constitution to Collect a'Judicial Tox" in the
form of a filing fee for the Judicial process?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the United States District Court of North Carolina, Eastern District abuse its discretion by not establishing subject-matter-jurisdiction, once it was challenged by petitioner via motion?

Docket Entries

2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Harry James
Harry Sharod James — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent