1) Can the constitutional right to due process be protected when federal courts regularly apply inconsistent and erroneous standards to determining the materiality of suppressed evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995)?

2) Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit apply an erroneous standard to assessing the materiality of a cooperating witness's letter to an Orleans Parish Assistant District Attorney stating that the entire case against the defendants is made up of lies?

Can the constitutional right to due process be protected when federal courts regularly apply inconsistent and erroneous standards to determining the materiality of suppressed evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995)?