1. Whether Congress implicitly or explicitly bar Petitioner a
victim of "extrajudicial killings and torture " from
seeking relief under the Torture victims Protection Act.

2. whether a lower court can exhibit two judgments in a case,
one judgment with constitutional authority and subject
matter jurisdiction, hereinafter-deemed the Chief Judge
ORDER, While the second an unconstitutional order,
hereinafter-deemed the Junior Judge ORDER.

3. Whether a lower court without subject matter jurisdiction,
in jurisprudence can order an amendment in a complaint,
when the lower court lack subject matter jurisdiction.

4. Whether the Court of Appeals can summarily affirm a "void
judgment " of a lower court without looking into its own
Article III standing and justiciable issues of the case.

5. whether the Clerks of the U.S District Court and the DC
Circuit Court of Appeal perform fiduciary duties and if
Clerks can corrupt the law, when Clerks swear oath to
uphold the law.

6. Whether this case implicate or circumvent "National
Security " interest, or a "National Embarrassment " that
manifest the injustice of denial of a forum to seek
redress for "black sited " human rights violations. And
whether 18 U.S.C.S. 242 is implicated.

7. The question presented is whether a writ of mandamus shall
issue directing the court of appeals to remand the case to
the Chief Judge of the district court without delay.

whether Congress implicitly or explicitly bar Petitioner a victim of 'extrajudicial killings and torture' from seeking relief under the Torture Victims Protection Act