No. 22-5792
Armad Jamall Gatling v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure court-of-appeals dismissal district-court due-process merits restitution sentence-enhancement standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the Court of Appeals err in dismissing Mr. Gatling's appeal without reviewing its merits?
2. Did the district court err when determining the amount of restitution and sentence enhancement?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals err in dismissing Mr. Gatling's appeal without reviewing its merits?
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Attorneys
Armad Jamall Gatling
Mark Diamond — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent