No. 22-5786

Foroud Foladpour v. City of Upland, California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-10-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment government-liability judicial-discretion negligence standing trial-court-procedure
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment Takings
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

judicial discretion
Rearview on a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right Is judicial discretion
discretion is abused power of official to act the dictates of their own Judgment and consciences
Cases will be resolved clear Errors conflicts of lowers court of the U.S of Justices
In Compelling Reasons
Petitions Injury case damages "Physical Emotional Finical "caused by negligent city of Upland
city liable because Failed to repair and volitions of government code Discretions is abused when Judicial Trail court actions is arbitrary fanciful, or understandable
trail court judge has been discretions abused from Oct-1 8-2019 first final judgment on August- 16-
2021- 2th final judge on Feb-02-2022 during five years -Trial court making their own rules power
the abused the injure person "petitions "For sure abused the Consultations of law -
The United State clear the law. the Citizen affirm that the government of the exists to serve its
Citizen of United States - The Consultations assigned to Congress responsivity - for organizing the
executive and Judicial branches raising revenue declaring making all laws necessary for executing
these powers. Not discretions power "judicial discretion "

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Judicial discretion is not a matter of right

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-12-12
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)

Attorneys

Foroud Foladpour
Foroud Foladpour — Petitioner