No. 22-5779
James Michael Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-sufficiency jury-instructions money-laundering standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence wire-fraud
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by finding that the evidence was sufficient to convict Mr. Johnson of wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering, where evidence of specific intent was insufficient.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the evidence at trial was insufficient to convict the petitioner of wire fraud and money laundering
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)
Attorneys
James Johnson
Peter L. Goldman — Saboura, Goldman & Colombo, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent