No. 22-5777
In Re Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-conviction due-process equal-protection evidence-tampering jury-instructions jury-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct racial-bias
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1-Attached transcripts prores that tral Judge & Prosecution acknowledged that the
y u F
Eq Pc aahFd Dis coudendRu
Claiming it is not Extraordinary -..
- page 4
2At o
in a scheme to avoid a mistrial, because he "never implemented the solution to
the problem with the dury" as he stated he would ...
-page. 5
4
in the process oF our courts" Buck, Id. at. 778
.page 6
P J c
And this Petitroner cannot get his day in court
Please, can I get my day in Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant's Rule 60(b) motion to vacate the conviction based on evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, racial-bias, and a tainted jury
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-26
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Adib Eddie Makdessi
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi — Petitioner