No. 22-5767
Silas Kendricks v. Okeechobee Correctional Institution, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights detention due-process equal-protection florida-statute legal-adherence procedural-violation respondent-liability
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-11-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHEM THERE 18 8 PULSE OF OPPLILEABLE haa) § 944.176)
FLORZLDA STATUS , ADD THE RECORD OF THE CASE RUEVIGALS
THAT ADHERENCE OF THAT APPLLLABLE LAW LS UN KEPT BY
JHE RESPONDENT, AND THE MOM- ADHERENCE LEADS TO
DETENTION OF 9 DETAINEES Tn VEOLATIOAL OF NTS CONSTLTUTLONNVL RIGHTS To DUE PROCESS AOD Dut PEOCESS OF THE LAW, CAN THE DETOUTION BYE CONSTITUTLONALLY hKEGAL P
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the detention of detainees by the respondent is unconstitutional due to the respondent's failure to adhere to the applicable Florida statute, in violation of the detainees' constitutional rights to due process and equal protection
Docket Entries
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent Okeechobee Correctional Institution, et al. to respond filed.
2022-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Okeechobee Correctional Institution, et al.
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Silas Kendricks
Silas Kendricks — Petitioner