Lynn Richard Norton v. David Barker, et al.
(A) Whether, The Law Suet las Femely Bnowéol Usclee Jénness2€ Code Prince Seclron, 18-1106 Srale OF Lamztation, When File Two Years, Later Of The on. May ] l aoly ncacleat, When The Charges CECURING. On May |I,a014 Wasn't Tnvalzdated Upolell Max, a. 19,A0al, by A Zrors Not Gurlty Verdact.?
(B) Whether, Ma.Noatow, Hac Io Twunleclate Ihe A ae Courts , Jo State_AClazm OF Actton for Matteross. frostécatIon Uncle Count (14) of Whe Syperstdin Tndzdméat Ai Zaolatied Tnexdewt Occuring ON My /), 9014, Hint Las AA urtnlled by Dhé Trt SURORS Not Guzlhy Verdzct, bu March 17, aoals
(C) liheHee lhe Count OF Appeals Lrkor, dn Lismassiwg a He. Northen s Appeals tse. ldput OF easecu tion, Lue 7b Me: Norhws Intreccéstton hud Unable fo. Pay Jin fount Of CH505.00> Dolhnas?
Whether the law suit has been wrongly dismissed under Tennessee Code Section 18-1106 State of Limitation, when filed two years later of the incident, when the charges occurring on May 11, 2014 wasn't invalidated until May 19, 2021, by a jury's not guilty verdict