No. 22-5758
Augustus H. Evans, Jr. v. Delaware
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-rights commerce-clause constitutional-provisions due-process energy-policy environmental-regulation judicial-review legal-jurisdiction procedural-rules statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Louisiana statute banning the sale of petrol-based motor vehicles violate the dormant Commerce Clause?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-12-14
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-28
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2022-11-21
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent Atty Gen. of State of Delaware to respond filed.
2022-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Atty Gen. of State of Delaware
Sean P. Lugg — Respondent
Augustus Evans, Jr.
Augustus Hebrew Evans Jr. — Petitioner