Ervin Carter v. Tim Hooper, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
1. ) Whether this Honorable United States Supreme Court 'must "
investigate and resolve jurisdiction if raised by one of the petitioning
party(ies) to the litigation?
2. ) Whether when jurisdiction to adjudicate is wanting in the lower
federal court due to federal-preemption of state law (whereas the
federally-preempted state law is the basis of the lower court judgment
is), can the lower Federal Court legally transfer jurisdiction to this
Honorable United States Supreme Court?
3. ) Whether the lower transferring Federal Court lacking jurisdiction to
adjudicate due to the challenged judgment being the by-product of
federally preempted state law, can the lower court constitutionally
evade satisfying itself on the issue of Federal-Preemption of State law
before attempted to reach any other judgment?
4. ) Whether this Honorable Court can by-pass the questions of
jurisdiction being tainted by the existence and operation of State laws
which suffered federal-preemption from their inception?
5. ) Whether an enforceable judgment can constitutionally arise out of
application of Federally-Preempted State Laws, being used to deprive a
person, recognized as enjoying substantive constitutional protections
from the existence and operation of federally-preempted state laws?
Whether this Honorable United States Supreme Court 'must' investigate and resolve jurisdiction if raised by one of the petitioning party(ies) to the litigation?