No. 22-5752
Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Loretto
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment appellate-review concurrent-sentence-doctrine due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Takings HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FourthAmendment Takings HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Whether the Court of Appeals for Third Circuit incorrectly
determined that the concurrent sentence doctrine can be used
on a petitioner with solely consecutive sentences.
2) Whether the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
incorrectly determined that the concurrent sentence doctrine
is not a violation of a petitioner's constitutional rights
under the Due Process and Eaual Protection Clauses afforded
by the 5th and 14th Amendments.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the concurrent sentence doctrine can be applied to a petitioner with solely consecutive sentences
Docket Entries
2023-01-23
Petition DENIED
2023-01-23
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-12-29
Reply of petitioner Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr. filed.
2022-12-19
Brief of respondent Warden, FCI Loretto in opposition filed.
2022-11-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 19, 2022.
2022-11-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 17, 2022 to December 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-18
Response Requested. (Due November 17, 2022)
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-06
Waiver of right of respondent Warden, FCI Loretto to respond filed.
2022-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr.
Ricardo M. Suggs Jr. — Petitioner
Warden, FCI Loretto
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent