1) Petitioner respectfully request that this Honorable Court revisit it's holding in Martinez v Court of Appeal of California Fourth Appellate Dist. 528 U.S. 152 ( 2000 ) only to the extent that: For states that do not permit for pro se criminal appeals, a complete and sufficient pro se appeal record must be provided in accordance with the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. In the case at bar, Petitioner was deprived of copies of the Respondent trial and sentencing exhibits with vital and catastrophic consequences.

2) Was the Habeas Corpus proceedings defective when the District Court denied habeas corpus relief without ever seeing Respondent Trial Exhibits #9 and #22 ( DVDS ) and Sentencing Exhibits #4-#7 demonstrating that the sentences imposed were/are Unconstitutional?

3) Did Petitioner demonstrate "Actual Innocence" with "clear and convincing evidence" pursuant to the 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1) that the state courts decisions affirming the judgment of conviction and sentence was not support by the record.

Whether a state that permits pro se criminal appeals must provide a complete and sufficient record for the appeal, as required by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses