No. 22-5720
Mark Julian Edmonds v. United States
Tags: acca armed-career-criminal-act constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure habeas-corpus jurisdictional-challenge procedural-standard residual-clause sentencing sentencing-enhancement unconstitutional
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was Mr. Edmonds required to prove, in district court, that it is "more likely than not" that the sentencing judge "actually relied on" the ACCA's unconstitutional residual clause when imposing the original sentence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Edmonds was required to prove that it is 'more likely than not' that the sentencing judge 'actually relied on' the ACCA's unconstitutional residual clause when imposing the original sentence
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2022)
Attorneys
Mark Julian Edmonds
James Matthew Wright — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent