No. 22-5712
Ramona I. Morgan v. Gloria Geither
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure district-court-jurisdiction double-jeopardy due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction motion-to-vacate prosecutorial-discretion sentencing-review statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-11-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Should the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit have granted a Certificate of Appeal to the Petitioner [Edmond Morgan]?
2. Should the United States District Court for the District of Kansas have granted Morgan's Certificate of Appeal?
3. Should the District Court for the District of Kansas have granted [text unclear due to handwriting]?
4. Should the District Court for the District of Kansas have [text unclear due to handwriting]?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the United States Court of Appeals for the [oth Circuit have granted a Certificate of Appealability to the Petitioner Ramona Morgan?
Docket Entries
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent Gloria Geither to respond filed.
2022-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 31, 2022)
Attorneys
Gloria Geither
Brant M. Laue — Solicitor General of Kansas, Respondent
Ramona I. Morgan
Ramona Morgan — Petitioner