LACK OF STANDING IS A JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PANEL. LACK OF POWER TO DECREE IS ALSO A JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT. THE PANEL DECISION CONFLICTS WITH MICHIGAN LAW AND WITH A DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. CONSIDERATION BY THE FULL COURT IS THEREFORE NECESSARY TO SECURE AND MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY OF THE COURT'S DECISION.

1. BOTH THE DISTRICT COURT AND THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PANEL CONFLICTS WITH THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE III, § 2 AND UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT WHERE THE FACTUAL PREDICATE OF PLAINTIFF'S LAMB'S ENTIRE COMPLAINT FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT WAS NOT ADJUDICATED ON THE MERITS RESOLVING THE CASE OR CONTROVERSY IN A CONCRETE WAY, THUS, THE CASE IS NOT RIPE, CREATING A JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT.

2. ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEFENDANTS DECEIVED THE DISTRICT COURT INTO RULING THAT THE DEFENDANTS RENDERED LICENSED TREATMENT ONLY RESERVED BY PHYSICIANS, COMMITTING A FRAUD UPON THE COURT OR AT THE VERY LEAST, PERJURY, WHERE THE DISTRICT COURT'S RULING IS VOID AB INITIO AS DIRECTED BY UNITED STATES V. THROCKMORTON, 98 US 61 (1878), HAZEL-ATLAS GLASS CO. V. HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO, 322 US 238 (1944) AND DEMJANJUK V. PETROVSKY, 10 F3D 338 (1993). THE PANEL CONFLICTS WITH THESE CASES.

Lack-of-standing-is-a-jurisdictional-defect