Ronald Buzzard, Jr. v. Washington
DueProcess Privacy
Is Buzzard's judgment and Sentence void and invalid on the face due to the handwritten "fraudulent interlineations" on the face by the sentencing Judge which changed Buzzard's determinate sentence to an indeterminate de facto life sentence without his understanding and not on the transcripts/record as required by controlling case law violating Due Process, Equal Protection, and right to a Fake Sentencing Hearing under the Stryth and 14th Amendments?
Whether the sentencing judge's handwritten 'fraudulent interlineations' on the face of the judgment, which changed the defendant's determinate sentence to an indeterminate de facto life sentence without the defendant's understanding and not on the transcripts/record as required by controlling case law, violated the defendant's due process, equal protection, and right to a fair sentencing hearing under the 5th and 14th Amendments