Whether it is inconsistent with this Court's Slack v. McDaniel 824 U.S. 473 (2008) standard for a court of appeals to decline to issue a certificate of appealability to examine whether a district court violates a habeas corpus Fifth Amendment right to a full and fair opportunity to exercise 28 U.S.C. § 2609805 by failing to give a pro se movant an appropriate to amend a poorly pleaded forum motion pursuant to Fed. R.App.P. 15 before summarily dismissing the motion with prejudice merely six days after it was filed and only three (3) months into the case (Pvr) stub & jurisdiction.

Whether it is inconsistent with this Court's Slack v. McDaniel 524 U.S. 473 (2002) standard for a Court of Appeals to decline to issue a Certificate of Appealability to examine whether a district Court violates a Habeas Petitioner's 5th Amendment right to a full and fair opportunity to exercise 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claims by failing to give a pro se movant an opportunity to amend a poorly pleaded § 2255 motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 before summarily dismissing the motion with prejudice merely six days after it was filed and only three (3) months into the § 2255(f) statute of limitations