This case presents the Bill of Rights of the Constitution as first law.
By citing the Ninth Amendment under a duly filed "Notice of Constitutional Question " (Document 36 in the district court,) the following Big Repugnancy was previously presented to all parties and intervenors to the underlying case (United States of America, State of Maryland, and State of Virginia; vide Doc. 10 and Doc. 11 in the district court;)

"However, we observed a pronounced general shrinkage effect of approximately 20% and a highly significant variation in shrinkage across brain regions. In conclusion, chronic exposure of non-human primates to antipsvchotics was associated with reduced brain volume.
--University of Pittsburgh Primate Research Facility, (National Library of Medicine, NIH; found at Table of Ninth Amendment Repugnancies, written page 41, ECF page 45 of 158, Doc. 1, root case no. l:20-cv-00784, USDC EDVA-Alexandria Division)(emphasis added)

Ever since "the different parts of the WHOLE United States " have been complicit in the destruction of the brain organ during involuntary detentions in America, there has been a chronic violation of an unquestioned Ninth Amendment right to retain a full sized brain (vide similar effects of homicidal lobotomization, State of Wisconsin v. Jeffrey Dahmer, Case no, F-912542.) The breaking of these first laws of our country creates an ongoing "war against the constitution. " [Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. at 17 (1958)]

1. Do Americans have an unenumerated right to retain a full sized brain?

2. When the government starts intruding into our private minds with poisons (if even for just one of us disfavored thinkers) isn't the Constitution designed to stop such tyranny from being practiced by an unrestrained and overbearing majority, especially if the majority has graced itself with full sized brains?

3. By causing a one-fell-swoop education of American families, does the posting of a Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts (Federal Rules of Evidence) within nine varied opinions (perhaps concurring in part, perhaps dissenting in part) incent a voluntary public correction of this repugnancy and finally start the rehabilitation of the Ninth Amendment?

Do Americans have an unenumerated right to retain a full-sized brain?