No. 22-5638
Hector Martinez-Robos v. United States
Tags: controlled-substances criminal-procedure jury-instructions mandatory-minimum-sentences mens-rea plain-error sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Related Cases:
22-5693
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether an instructional error is "plain" for purposes of Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b) when the charge to the jury is erroneous under an opinion of this Court interpreting an identical term in a related statute.
2. Whether the knowingly mens rea in 21 U.S.C. § 960 applies to the type and quantity of controlled substance involved in the offense when those elements are used to establish mandatory minimum and enhanced maximum sentences.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-instructional-error-is-plain
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Hector Martinez-Robos
Benjamin Lee Coleman — Benjamin L. Coleman Law PC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent