No. 22-5626
James Earl Jones v. New Jersey
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggravated-assault case-law criminal-law criminal-statute jurisdiction legal-procedure murder remand sexual-assault statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1: (A) WHETHER THE TERM "ON ANOTHER" AS UTILIZED IN N.J.S.A.
2C:14-2(a)(3) APPLY or (B) WHETHER N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2(a)(6)
CONTROL IN PETITIONER 'S CASE OF "AGGRAVATED SEXUAL
AS S AULT/MURDER" ?
2: WHETHER THE CONTROLLING DECISION IN STATE v. RANGEL,
213 N.J. 500 (2013) REQUIRE THIS CASE TO BE REMANDED BACK
TO THE MOTION COURT
3: WHETHER THE PETITIONER WAS CHARGED UNDER THE
CORRECT STATUTE (N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2(a)(6) versus 2C:14-2(a)(3))?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-term-on-another-applies
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-29
Waiver of right of respondent New Jersey to respond filed.
2022-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 20, 2022)
Attorneys
James Jones
James Earl Jones — Petitioner
New Jersey
Jason Magid — Camden County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent