Is it INEFFECTINE ASSISTENCE OF COUNSEL WHERE : THEREBY PROUING NOT ALLOWE "TAMPERED EVIDENCE" WERE AT TRIAL DUE TO THE JUOGE "CHOOSINE 11 THIS WAS ONE. "AGREED TO" BY DEfENSE COUNCIL WITHOUT DEFENDENT'S APPROVAL OR KNOWLEBGE THE JUDGE RULED TL COULD NOT BRING UP THE "LEAS AGENT" ALEXANDER, CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR SINCE THAT FBI AGENT HAD NOT PLEAD PRIOR GUILTY. BUT ALEXANDER DID PLEAD GUILTY TO FRAUDULENTLY to TRIALI ALTERING GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS. DEFENSE ATTONNEY FOLLOWED UP. NEVER A d DOES 18 N.S.C. AT 2422 2251 (: 2252((4 (B), HAVE THE HERE SAME DEFINITION FOR SCIENTER'S MENS REA AS IN THE SURLEME COURTS RULINGS IN REHAIFVU.S. AND U.S. V.RUAN?

MUST THIS BE IN THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS?

Whether the petitioner was denied the effective assistance of counsel where the trial court allowed the introduction of tampered evidence without the petitioner's knowledge or consent