WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT THE STATE AGENCY CAN REQUIRE THAT FUTURE SOCIAL SECURITY RECIPIENTS PREMATURELY APPLY FOR REDUCED BENEFITS IN CLEAR CONTRADICTION TO UNITED STATES STATUTE WHICH PROHIBITS SUCH PRACTICE?

Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the state agency can require future social-security recipients to prematurely apply for reduced benefits in contradiction to federal statute