Whether Mr. Blackmon's appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue the trial court erred in its treatment of Mr. Blackmon's decision to be jointly represented by his co-defendant's counsel, and whether the state court's ruling on this claim was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law or was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts.

Whether the Appellate courts erred by rephrasing a certified question after being briefed and argued as requested by the State, circumventing this Court's decision in Holloway