No. 22-5561
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court appellate-review conviction due-process judicial-review napue-standard napue-v-illinois perjured-testimony perjury prosecutorial-misconduct reasonable-likelihood
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether The Appellate Court of Illinois rejection of Mr. Brooks assertion of knowing use
of perjured testimony to obtain a conviction had a reasonable likelihood of a different outcome
was consistent with Napue v. Illinois.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Appellate Court of Illinois rejection of Mr. Brooks assertion of knowing use of perjured testimony to obtain a conviction had a reasonable likelihood of a different outcome
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-06
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2022-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Illinois
Terrance Brooks
Terrance Brooks — Petitioner