No. 22-5559

Patricio Estrada v. Troy Nehls, Sheriff, Fort Bend County, Texas, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights deliberate-indifference disciplinary-isolation due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection medical-treatment prison-conditions
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

2) Can ya ackless Ho cbflerences in Duc Mecess. tights 40.adlhn. Segegahion, veties discyplinaty iSolatoty:asas Esttadhs £eual Astechon dad Lue lace a Aight? wolatecl by being placed in dittyplialy Solabion, pliol 40 any heating: luhen thote uras Clearly offer opto?

AM Se hs tec aetna ia hig te camtmaichon machine ated IF while ithe dpa bith which. used tot oreleting ustibiay mabetial hygiene. Medical tepuest appa dbscyaliaaty: Did Biles. and cuwers vialele Eshadas Eighth Amendment taptt of Hells. Const tutiog by eo Seizing Mecbcaly issued adokbanal rtatess lasbich He pesctiption uras Still vabid )exithoad the agaoval of 2 beerbed Medial fresnel:

W)Did Pals and desens violale Estradede Eighth Arcadtodt tglt of He US. Conshdabian, by tebesing him medical technent inmediclely ablet.a physical lebetcaton, deyaite He fact it was beyond abviaus Estate had phot plygcal dbabilidges and bp out-cnes of pain and oftficiley, Meat 1g? .

Qweat (se while OMicers) in thei treatment towsatdli Estrada (a hipanic) eweverses Athinisa (a cahife iamele) iamechabep aber an ableteabisn ?

Did dvens and files violale the Conjpinacy tule of #28)183,and $1050 f

(Did Quen and Mules violole Eshacls Due Pacers f fs, by lacing hia_ 1.00 diseyalne tsolaton ablet a. physical ablrcoie csith anh iat prt ba Jary ctitlen Statement ot heatiigf

Ded esa viele Esai Lesa lighl by ci — 41s pewonal ready taterial Cel gicos and lagallandl alate rt te the. jail Mihayy

|e) Did Defendant Etive vialale Estrada E ght Mrenchnent. 0S. Constitabenal tight ob "Failete-To: Mabe, by dbitegacd ing Meats made fron Mamate Mason, sevelal oly riot to. Mihinsen astiultitg Estrada? :

101d bid Delendutls Ev and Lily vialele Estadt tights of He US Coastbabias by tot aletoing a tait A seiplitaty heatyyg? dt

WA) Dict Delealant Rabias violale Estraclas Eighth Mncadnent US. Lanstiebth Aight by iatetteting with prescribed. medal Healmens. disarhive.a prescayptiag, Jand. jatentionally clelay access. to a 'licensed Medial permel all usitteet.a_ licease to de $a)? ©

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Estrada's due process rights were violated by being placed in disciplinary isolation prior to any hearing

Docket Entries

2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-03
Waiver of right of respondent Troy Nehls, et al. to respond filed.
2022-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2022)

Attorneys

Patricio Estrada
Patricio Estrada — Petitioner
Troy Nehls, et al.
Salvatore Philip LoPiccolo IIFort Bend County Attorney's Office, Respondent