Should fay Codr-J- bi fa/o^ocd h
facets fa fa
perceived fap/faAbno?do a/A -0 AmiVCS jury (juJesA'am b/
fa <u ^j/efaon
cj.J (jd) h ie kit5 rich! Ac due process of /oted oous
fat Tdfa (\urA or) eyfauordiekirj irdtrtjfdror ir)fa fat
fap ddhet^rors -fa sup sponfa amtoit d quefacn fad-A fat
n&Jtfa ussfad, fre,<ocA/s7ct
zAe C'/Ae coo/rfaSS) er-e. Ax
Zidcfatoi uohtr\
&?) lfa)h>ckics> /fad fa/tfesidM&rk, . d ke dee faooo ^rbifauryaod capricious pcHcr vTofekd tohen fat fate! coufa
Ufbjfijded d/o irsfauefar fa fat jury fafa fa^ Qfafa fakt
U a fa fat a h^d ro pro Zub/e zfauet

Whether the Court violated due process by reaching a sua sponte answer to a question not presented