I. A. Did the government prove beyond a reasonable doubt the
existence of a racketeering enterprise, a necessary element
for all of the charges, when there was no evidence of any
structure of membership, common purpose for an entity or
organization or continuing unit?

B. Could Petitioner be convicted of aiding and abetting the
VICAR convictions when there was no evidence that
Petitioner committed any act that furthered the commission
of the crime?

II. Should the jury have been allowed to convict Petition on the
hypo thetical existence of the predicate fed eral and state crimes?

III. Was Petitioner denied his right to confrontation and a fair trial by
admission of a hearsay statement, which was the basis for the
VICAR co nvictions?

IV. Was Petitioner entitled to text messages betwee n the agent in
charge and the cooperating witnesses under Jencks and Brady?

V. Can the good-faith exception to the warra nt requirement under
this Court's decision in United States v. Carpenter, 138 S. Ct.
2206, 2221 (2018), allow for the illegally seized information to
be admitted at trial?

VI. Was Petitioner deprived of his right to an impartial jury and
evidentiary hearing having established a colorable claim of
extraneous influence an d bias of juro rs?

VII. Can the trial judge impose multiple life sentences by considering
Petitioner's refu sal to admit his guilt after trial?

Did the government prove the existence of a racketeering enterprise?