Did the Trial Court error by improperly restricting the examination in light of newDefendant's right to re-cross and evidence presented by the Prosecution during matter and deny the Defendant the Constitutional Right to Compulsory Process of a key Government witness under the Sixth Amendment?redirect

Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals decide on important federal questions in a way that conflicts with it's own case law and relevant decisions of the Supreme Court?

Should an Appellate Court be required to conduct a through harmless error tests on significant issues of impact during a trial proceeding so as not to confine judicial review to a single individual, thus insuring a just review for a criminal defendant?

Was the effect of the error and continuous denials during re-cross examination so cumulative as to impose structural error on the proceedings and impact the entirety of the judicial process?

Did the Government fail to meet the standards necessary for Campaign Contribution Quid Pro Quo and/or "official action" standard?

Was the decision by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in conflict with that of other circuit courts and the Supreme Court regarding an important matter of the law as it relates to Federal Campaign Contribution and the First Amendment?

Did the Trial Court error by improperly restricting the Defendant's right to re-cross examination in light of new matter and evidence presented by the Prosecution during redirect and deny the Defendant the Constitutional Right to Compulsory Process of a key Government witness under the Sixth Amendment?