No. 22-5533
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 18-usc-3582c compassionate-release criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion sentencing
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT'S FAILURE TO PROPERLY CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATE FACTORS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) BEFORE DENYING MR. PINSON'S MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE VIOLATED HIS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's failure to properly consider the appropriate factors pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) before denying Mr. Pinson's motion for compassionate release violated his right to due process?
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Dario Pinson
Robin Farnsworth — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent