No. 22-5529
Anthony H. Lett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federal-rules federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance rehaif-standard rehaif-v-united-states standing
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did. Court of appeals error when denying Petitioner's
Rehaif v.: United States , 139 S.Ct. 204.
2. Was Petitioner 's ineffective assistance claim denied
in error.
3. Petitioner will supplement the foregoing under provisions
*
established in Fed. Fed.R. Crim.Pro. Rule 52(b).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court of appeals err in denying Petitioner's Rehaif v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 204 claim?
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Anthony Lett
Anthony H. Lett — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent