No. 22-5527

Dora L. Adkins v. Tyson's Lodging, LLC

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-review circuit-court-affirmance civil-procedure district-court-judgment due-process equal-protection federal-courts legal-sufficiency per-curiam-opinion rule-60-motion standing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-11-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Erred in the per curiam unpublished opinion and/or Judgment, Dated, August 25. 2022, when it "reviewed the record and found no reversible error. " "Accordingly, we affirm. Adkins v. Tysons Lodging , LLC, Law Case No. l:22-cv-00553 (AJT/WEF), (E.D. Va. filed May 31, 2022, entered June 1, 2022; June 8, 2022). " (Dkt. No. 23, Dkt. No. 24)). "We grant Adkins ' motion to replace her informal brief, treat her motion regarding Rule 60 as a motion to supplement her informal brief and grant that motion, but denied her motion to vacate. " Pet. Appendix A, pg. 19.

2. Whether the District Court "Order, " Dated, May 31, 2022, when it ADOPTED the Report and Recommendation in full, as part of the Final Order should be VACATED Pursuant to Rule 60. [Doc. No. 8].

3. Whether the District Court "Order, " Dated, May 31, 2022, when it Ordered the Denial of the Plaintiff/Appellant 's Motion for Leave from the Court to File an Emerency Complaint as a Final Order should be VACATED Pursuant to Rule 60. [Doc. No. 8].

4. Whether the District Court 's "Order, " Dated, May 31, 2022, when it Ordered the Denial of the Plaintiff/Appellant 's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Costs or Fees as part of the Final Order should be VACATED Pursuant to Rule 60. [Doc. No. 8].

5. Whether the District Court 's "Order, " Dated, May 31, 2022, when it Ruled the following: "This is a Final Order for the Purposes of Appeal, " should be VACATED Pursuant to Rule 60. [Doc. No. 8].

6. Whether the District Court Erred in the "Order," Dated, June 8, 2022, when it Ordered the Denial of the Plaintiff/Appellant 's Motion for Leave from the Court to File an Amended Emegency Complaint as a Final Order. [Doc. No. 17].

7. Whether the District Court Erred in the "Order," Dated, June 8, 2022, when it Ruled the following: "This is a Final Order for the Purposes of Appeal. " [Doc. No. 17].

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Erred in the per curiam unpublished opinion and/or Judgment

Docket Entries

2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-09-22
Supplemental brief of petitioner Dora L. Adkins filed.
2022-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2022)

Attorneys

Dora L. Adkins
Dora L. Adkins — Petitioner