No. 22-5514

Roland Scott, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction sentencing standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the United States Supreme Cort overturn it's own precedent
in Rehaf v. United States 139 S. Ct 2191, 20t L. Ed 594
2o1g), where this Cort decided on what makes a criminal
Convidion Constitionally vald in 18U.sc s922 (g?

2). Did the Western District of Wisconsin For The Seventh Circust
have Jurisdition over the petitioner for acriminal charge for
18 U.S.c. & 922 (g) Felon in Possession of a Firearm under the
predict offense?

3. Did the United States Court of Appeals, and the District Court
timely plea on directapped giving the petitioner a plausible

L. Ed 594 (2019) do to Counsel abandnment, and Confct in
tis mat whn Sreme C car elmen o 2?

). Did the hd Ss Dist Curt abusets disreon pusont
to 18 U.s.cs$424, 0. 34242 in Criminal proceedingsin
which a question of competencyarises, by not ordering a
Violate the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourterth Amendmends of the
Unled States Constitutionin Sdical Proceedings?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Supreme Court overturn its own precedent in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191, 204 L. Ed. 2d 594 (2019)

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Roland Scott
Roland Scott Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent