1) Should Lawyers be allowed to commit fraud
upon the court by intentionally and
knowingly submitting false and fabricated
documents as evidence in the court of law to
obtain judgment to deprive homeowners of
their real property of many years?

2) Whether, the Ninth Circuit erred when it
held, that the district court did not abuse its
discretion by denying the Kramers' motion
for reconsideration under Rules 60(b) and
60(d)(3) when there is clear and convincing
evidence which demonstrates that Kent F.
Larsen Esq. Nevada Bar No. 3468, an
Officer of the Court submitted fabricated
Assignment of Deed of Trust and fabricated
purchase and assumption agreement and
EXPIRED VOID Limited Power of Attorney
in the United States District Court to obtain
judgement in favor of JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. to deprive Petitioners of their
rights to their real property which they held
in Joint Tenancy with Right of
Survivorship?

3) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it
held that the Kramers' arguments or
allegations were raised for the first time on
appeal when there is clear and convincing
evidence that shows that the Kramers had
already raised the facts concerning the false
and fabricated documents in the United
States District Court?

4) Whether in deciding the District Court's
denial of the Petitioners' Fed, R. Civ. P.
60(b) and Fed, R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) motion,
did the Ninth Circuit err when it upheld
the US District Court's decision to dismiss
Petitioners' claims against JPMorgan
Chase Bank based on the false assertion to
the US District Court that Petitioners, Leo
Kramer and Audrey Kramer were both
judicially estopped, when Audrey Kramer
NEVER filed bankruptcy and when Chase
Bank never filed proof of claim in Chapter
7 Bankruptcy Case # 10-43951, which was
fully adjudicated June 2011?

Should lawyers be allowed to commit fraud upon the court?