(1) Is it abuse of false evidence to convict a petitioner for a crime, where there has never been any proof of deception that does use / in this case? Can/s the use of evidence used to fulfill the victim?

(2) Is it a proper Sr the enforcement to be derived the right to be without a reduction to the proper title Deris before Commission Ue///~p& ss the life followed to jutre —cc/evyfop

(3) od the commission's IXjI/V? that Mas given it'd Not have a signature < any decree of to be binding it must have a signature on //~r/i

(4) the petitioner Should not have been/s/tt/j assessed to because there has Such mill be separated offense cited by the Commission a s

(5) if the petitioners does not have u/oa^t/ssu^pytt&z'L'Surjtt yfit Wr urm before court y j ^ dmA y l/tod JSjh/i a,/ -Me. crime sc**JJ ft?/ S Po Mre.

Where there has never been any conviction