1. Did the court below err in not considering the
issue that pro se litigants in Texas justice courts are
treated unequally from all litigants in non-justice courts in
violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment and the due process clauses of the Fifth and
Fourteenth Amendments?

2. Did the court below err in not considering the
that pro se litigants in Harris County justice courts
treated unequally from all litigants in non-justice
courts in Harris County in violation of the equal protection
clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the due process
clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?

3. Did the court below err in not considering that
the filing of a sworn affidavit of prejudice which is not
referred to another judge deprives the challenged judge of
personal jurisdiction over an affiant?

4. Did the court below err in not considering the fact
that if a judge takes discretionary actions against a litigant
without personal jurisdiction, that judge has waived
judicial immunity and is subject to civil damages?

5. Did the court below err in not considering the
issue that sovereign immunity violates the Constitution,
that the United States has no sovereign, and that this
British color-of-law anomaly merely serves to protect
corrupt government agents and agencies and deny redress
of grievances to Americans?

6. Did the court below err in not considering the
issue that the "litigation exception" to the Texas Public
Information Act is unconstitutional, that it denies
substantive due process and public information to
litigants-especially en pro se litigants- who have been
denied discovery under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
500.9?

Did the court below err in not considering the issue that pro se litigants in Texas justice courts are treated unequally from all litigants in non-justice courts in violation of the equal-protection, due-process, 14th-amendment