Did the Chief Deputy District Clerk ERR in excepting the search warrant and return without a prior stamp file on its face and then file it into the appellate record?

Did the 5TH Circuit ERR in the ruling that Moore did not show a denial of a Constitutional Right under the 6th Amendment to ineffectiveness of Counsel when Counsel failed to adequately suppress the admission of State's evidence without a search warrant and return ever being a part of the filings in the trial court?

In light of this newly discovered evidence - search warrant and return - provided by the State, 5 years later; did it deny Moore's 4th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights to the Constitution; thereby tainting Moore's Habeas Corpus proceedings?

Did the Chief Deputy District Clerk err in excepting the search warrant and return without a prior stamp file on its-face and then file it into the appellate record?