No. 22-5428
Norman Lafonte Pryor, aka Nc LaFonse Pryor v. Ronald Erdos, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure dna-evidence due-process exculpatory-evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel due to counsel's failure to adequately communicate with the petitioner and pursue a defense based on the lack of DNA evidence and other exculpatory evidence
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent Ronald, Warden Erdos to respond filed.
2022-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Norma L. Pryor
Norman Lafonte Pryor — Petitioner
Ronald, Warden Erdos
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent