No. 22-5394

Eric Christopher Falkowski v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: controlled-substance-act controlled-substances criminal-law due-process enhancement-clause overbreadth sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation vagueness void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether USSG § lBl.l 's serious-bodily-injury enhancement clause —as
relative here to the Controlled Substance Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq—is
impermissibly overbroad or void for vagueness?

Whether the equitable tolling doctrine —as applicable to the Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA ")—is a dead letter of caselaw?

Whether, under Sup. Ct. 12.4 and 13.3, a petitioner 's ability to join in a
codefendant 's petition for certiorari to the United Supreme Court alters the
AEDPA 's one-year limitations period?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether USSG § 1B1.1's enhancement clause is impermissibly overbroad or void for vagueness

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2022)

Attorneys

Eric C. Falkowski
Eric Christopher Falkowski — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent