1. WHETHER. The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Erred In Finding Petitioners ' Claim
To Be Frivolous after, as stated by the Appellate Court "Upon a review of the record, the
response to the court 's January 11,2022 order, and the opening brief field on
February 10,2022. " Petitioners request that the Court review the U.S. Court of
Appeals documents previously submitted by Plaintiffs '/Appellants '/ Petitioners
(response, Respondents ' documents of Petitioners ' Previously Filed In The U.S
Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeal; Docket/Petitioner; which Respondent erred finding
Petitioner 's Appeal to be frivolous?

2. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Abused Its Discretion by
Upholding The Eastern District Court 's Decision And Order
Dated: June 14, 2022, Dismissing Plaintiffs ' Case As Being Frivolous?

3. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit Court Erred In Finding Appellant 's in forma
pauperis status, And The Appeal "not taken in good faith and revoked Appellant 's
in forma pauperis status?

4. WHETHER. The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Abused Its Discretion by Denying
Plaintiff/ Appellant/Petitioner To Proceed In Forma Pauperis?

5. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Abused its discretion, erred,
and Deprived Petitioners Of A Fair and Just Trial/RIGHT TO DUE
PROCESS by determining that Petitioners ' Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
is Frivolous concluding, denying, and dismissing Petitioners ' Appeal as Frivolous?

6. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Abused Its Discretion by
Informing The Eastern District Court To Consider Certifying Court to Certify
Appellant 's Appeal "is not taken in good faith" And The Ninth Circuit Court
"determined Appellant 's Case To Be Frivolous And The Ninth Circuit Appellate
Court Dismissed Plaintiffs/Appellant 's/Petitioners Case?

7. WHFTHFR. the Eastern District Magistrate Judge Abused her
discretion by failing to grant Plaintiffs/Petitioner 's Request For an Ex Parte?

8. WHETHER. The Eastern District Magistrate Judge Abused her discretion by
not allowing Plaintiffs/Petitioners to have the option to Decline or Accept
Magistrate Judge who involved herself Plaintiff s/Petitioner 's case?

9. WHETHER. Plaintiff M.T. was at risk of catching the Delta Variant or Corona
Virus by attending crowded school of children at FOREVER FRIENDS EARLY
LEARNING CENTER LLC Where The School 's Adult Worker, Teacher, And
Care Giver Left Minor Children Unattended To Roam Into The Front Office
Without Masks, Where And Her Companion Adult
Experienced The Two Children, Unattended and Walking Up To Both Adults
Without Both Of The Children Wearing Masks?

10. WHETHER. The Sacramento Superior Court Family Law Judge acted outside of
her Judicial Authority or Scope of her duty by making an order that deprive
PlaintiffTPetitioner Carina Conerly of her United States Constitution Guaranteed
Right to video tape in a public

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in finding petitioners' claim to be frivolous