No. 22-5388
IFP
Tags: administrative-remedy civil-procedure civil-rights court-jurisdiction due-process fraud fraud-claim legal-duty mandamus standing venue-change writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-10-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing the Oakland Circuit court to retain jurisdiction of case or/to remand the case to the district court without delay.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing the Oakland Circuit court to retain jurisdiction of case or/to remand the case to the district court without delay
Docket Entries
2022-10-17
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-08-15
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2022)
Attorneys
In Re Roszetta McNeill
Roszetta Marie McNeill — Petitioner